Memento Mori translation….. Literally “Remember to die”
At possibly no other time in history have the living been so preoccupied with the dead as in the Victorian era. It was during this period that postmortem photography (also known as memorial portraiture, mourning photography, or memento mori ) thrived. Postmortem photography, the practice of photographing the recently deceased, was, in fact, an extremely prevalent form of photography in the Victorian era; more photographs of this type were taken than of any other single type of photography for the time period.
Memorial portraits did not begin with photography, long before the invention of even the early camera obscura, paintings of the deceased occurred. The clergy of the sixteenth century were often painted immediately following death, usually sitting up, or lying, in bed. In the early nineteenth century, it was customary to paint the portraits of wealthy young children whom had died, usually illustrating the child alive, but with a symbol of some sort to indicate death.
The invention of the daguerreotype, the first commercially practical photographic process in 1839, made portraiture much more mainstream. Although the majority could not afford to commission an artist to capture their portrait, more could afford to sit for a photographic session. Although, like paintings, the daguerreotype could not be reproduced, it was much faster than sitting for a painting, requiring only 10 -15 minutes in bright lighting. The more moderate cost and time involved offered middle-class Victorians the means to memorialize their deceased relatives.
A daguerreotype was very decorative. The photo image is on a silver clad copper sheet which is attached to a sheet of glass by a foil-like brass decorative frame. These photographs offered families a cherished keepsake to remember their lost loved ones by. They served to preserve the image of the deceased in a way that had not previously been available to the majority of Victorians. Most people of that time period never had a portrait painted, or even a photograph taken, in their entire lives. Though more affordable than a commissioned painted portrait, at $5.00 for a daguerreotype, it was still more than a weeks pay for most people. In most cases, a postmortem photograph might be the only image of the deceased that the family ever had. Especially common are postmortem photographs of infants and young children. Victorian era childhood mortality rates were extremely high, and especially in the case of very young children, most families would never have had an image to remember their lost child by, were it not for these memorial portraits.
1854 saw the advancement in photography of color-tinted ambrotypes, thin negative images on glass made to appear as a positive by showing them against a black background. Ambrotypes sold at less than half the price of a daguerreotype. Tintypes, introduced in 1856 and made of thin black iron, were cheaper yet. Sold for a penny or less, tintypes made photography universally available. With a greater demand for their work, postmortem photographers began to experiment by “enhancing” the effect of life in memorial portraits; methods such as propping the subject’s eyes open, painting eyes onto the subject’s closed lids, or painting pupils onto the photographic print were utilized. A rosy tint could even be added later to the cheeks of the corpse on a tintype. Interestingly, as the costs involved with photography itself decreased, the price for a postmortem photograph actually increased, indicating its value and continued popularity.
Early postmortem photographs are usually close-ups of the face, or full-body shots, and rarely include a coffin. The subject was often depicted as if asleep, but another popular practice was to arrange the subject to appear more lifelike, including bracing or tying the corpse into a standing position, or supporting the corpse on the bodies of other family members in the portrait. Children were often shown lying on a couch or in a bed, often with a favorite toy. It was common to photograph very young children with a family member, frequently the mother, but often with older siblings. Adults were more commonly posed in chairs or even braced and tied onto specially-designed frames.
By 1859, a new photographic process, producing the carte de visite or CDV had become widespread. The CDV was a small photograph, usually made of an albumen print -a thin paper photograph mounted on a thicker paper card. With a CDV, multiple prints could be made from a single negative; this meant that copies of the postmortem photograph could be mailed to relatives. Surviving families were proud of these images; hanging them in their homes, sending copies to friends and relatives (who may have never seen the deceased before the death), wearing them as lockets, or carrying them as pocket mirrors.
By the early 1870s, cartes de visite were completely overthrown by “cabinet cards,” which were also usually albumen prints, but larger, mounted on cardboard backs measuring 4½ by 6½ inches.
The official practice of postmortem photography began to fade in the early twentieth century. Kodak introduced the Brownie camera and “snapshot” photography became a mass phenomenon; photos became more commonplace, and viewed much less as works of art. Death also became sparser, as health care and medical knowledge gained ground. Rather than embracing mortality, society began to shun any reminders of it. Up until this time, most funerals had taken place at home, in the parlor, or “death room”. As more and more funerals began to take place in the new funeral parlors, the home parlor became known as the “living room”, and in 1910, the Ladies Home Journal declared the “death room” to be a term of the past.
For further examples of Victorian postmortem photography:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/misty_bee/sets/72157626699396884/













I was looking for something completely different for my dissertation, but have found myself drawn to this. Really good web page on a topic I did not know existed.
Thank you; I find it fascinating myself, both from a historian & photgrapher’s point of view… my one postmortem cabinet card has grown to a modest collection including postmortem CDV’s, tintypes, and daguerreotypes. An interesting part being that the antique dealers I have purchased the photos from do not know that the subject in the photo is deceased… there are certain small signs to look for that can give it away, though.
Amazing! Scary.
i was amazed!!
How can you tell who is dead in the photos? what are the clues? I’m thinking of the family photo with the parents with the child on a rocking(?) horse. I cn’t tell who is dead. thanks.
In the case of that particular photo, the child on the rocking horse is the deceased. Often you can recognize a postmortem photo by looking for certain signs: magnification of the face to look for fixed, dilated pupils, or “painted on” pupils, fixed expressions, mouths held closed artificially, signs of a stand if the person is standing, or a neck brace if the person is sitting, and occasionally, photography studio information on the back will actually tell you if the photographer specialized in memorial portraiture.There is an extremely in-depth book preview at the following link that goes into great detail on the “tricks-of-the-trade” that photographers of the era used to try to convey a life-like image.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/88228949/Likeness-Early-Postmortem-Photography-and-the-Pornography-of-Death
I enjoyed your presentation on the subject of Victorian Mourning Pictures. I was lucky enough to have taken an elective college English course which delved in-depth into the psychology and purpose of these heart-wrenching photographs.
I think our class concluded that the main reason for this period in photography was the fact that the art of photography was still in its infancy and was still unaffordable for the majority of the people. However, when someone died in a family and the person who died had never been photographed before, the survivors were usually willing to pay any cost just to have a final memento of that person as they once lived.
This is a very heartbreaking subject. I don’t know if you have heard about the following painting, but it has a very interesting story to go with it. In fact, as you read more about it, I think there is a poem by Adrienne Rich that was written years later to accompany the painting:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edwin_Romanzo_Elmer
http://templepoetry.blogspot.com/2009/06/mourning-picture.html
In the dauguerrotype, which required the subjects to be completely still for several minutes, the parents have moved slightly blurring their images, while the dead girl, being dead, has not moved and is crystal clear in the picture.
I do not even know how I ended up here, but I thought this
Cheers!
post was great. I do not know who you are but definitely you are going to a famous blogger if you are not already
Pingback: Haunting mystery girl, part 1 | BlackenedRoots.com
I have 2 quite large postmortem paintings of babies that I just bought recently. I can’t find any info on these or what they would be worth. I am wondering if they are rare. Both antique stores didn’t have a clue what the were but I did right away. Just wondering if anyone has any info on postmortem paintings! Please email me if so! Blondebabe0028@bellsouth.net thanks!!
Pingback: A vikoriánus Anglia post-mortem fotói | GRJ